I won't be posting anything next week, so make sure to go see Django Unchained this Christmas.
Or Zero Dark Thirty if its playing in a theater near you.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Skyfall
This is not a review of Skyfall, just a memo to you out there who have yet to see it. Please see it this weekend. Don't do it for James Bond, but do it for the death of Twilight.
Should Skyfall have another better weekend than Twilight, it has the potential to out gross the film domestically. This would be a great accomplishment here in the US as it shows the downfall of the twilight franchise who cannot stand up against the likes of a 50 year old franchise. While Twilight cannot rebrand itself, James Bond has and will continue to push forward into cinema history.
This twilight fan craze is over and its time to put it on the back burner to die. Help Skyfall out gross the final Twilight film and get a great movie for your purchase.
Should Skyfall have another better weekend than Twilight, it has the potential to out gross the film domestically. This would be a great accomplishment here in the US as it shows the downfall of the twilight franchise who cannot stand up against the likes of a 50 year old franchise. While Twilight cannot rebrand itself, James Bond has and will continue to push forward into cinema history.
This twilight fan craze is over and its time to put it on the back burner to die. Help Skyfall out gross the final Twilight film and get a great movie for your purchase.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Blue Ray or Blu-ray or Blu Ray or Blue-ray
I feel Blu-Ray is a bit too complicated to say. It's a lot more simple to say DVD than Blu-Ray since it is still relatively new and we are not yet completely over the DVD hump. Just like with VHS prior, the DVD will be outdated and so will the Blu-Ray with digital downloads and instant streaming. People still buy these because it is a physical copy that they can hold and see. It's that comfortability of knowing it will forever be there and never be deleted.
This is why, no matter what happens, I feel we will always have something physical when it comes to media. The most basic example are CD's. Even though iTunes MP3's far outsell physical CD's, people still by the physical copy because it is something you can hold. That sense of security rather than a false hope of it being forever.
My belief is that we will always have this notion of physicality that will never go away. No matter how advance technology gets with the digital age, having something physical will always be around.
This is why, no matter what happens, I feel we will always have something physical when it comes to media. The most basic example are CD's. Even though iTunes MP3's far outsell physical CD's, people still by the physical copy because it is something you can hold. That sense of security rather than a false hope of it being forever.
My belief is that we will always have this notion of physicality that will never go away. No matter how advance technology gets with the digital age, having something physical will always be around.
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Fake It Till You Make It
"I have no idea what I'm doing" - science dog
Most of us have no idea what we are doing in a new environment because we do not know the standards or the expectations that precede us since we were not there. This is why new people are always given the benefit of the doubt while they are still fresh at the company. But when does that line cross when you are no longer considered new but an experienced regular co-worker being held to the same standards as everybody else?
I have no idea where that line is. My guess is somewhere between working with other people and running a project on your own. Right about there is when people no longer see you as the new guy and instead see you as another worker in the office. I don't mean just another number, but being held to the same standards as everybody else.
So my advice is to do what you know for as long as you can while trying to improve yourself along the way. When I started, I did what I knew and that worked out for a month. After that month, I was able to get my bearings around the office and be able to run things myself. Everybody adjusts differently, but it's all the same wherever you go.
Most of us have no idea what we are doing in a new environment because we do not know the standards or the expectations that precede us since we were not there. This is why new people are always given the benefit of the doubt while they are still fresh at the company. But when does that line cross when you are no longer considered new but an experienced regular co-worker being held to the same standards as everybody else?
I have no idea where that line is. My guess is somewhere between working with other people and running a project on your own. Right about there is when people no longer see you as the new guy and instead see you as another worker in the office. I don't mean just another number, but being held to the same standards as everybody else.
So my advice is to do what you know for as long as you can while trying to improve yourself along the way. When I started, I did what I knew and that worked out for a month. After that month, I was able to get my bearings around the office and be able to run things myself. Everybody adjusts differently, but it's all the same wherever you go.
Welcome to Earth
The only line that was missing from the new Will Smith movie After Earth. Will Smith teams up with his son, Jaden Smith, in this semi-sequel to The Pursuit of Happiness. Mr. Smith plays a futuristic pilot who crash lands with his son on Earth years after all human life has left. This trailer looks very promising as it brings a futuristic feel to it reminiscent of Avatar with the upgraded animals trying to kill them. However, this film does have one major setback that is not seen in the trailer.
The movie is directed by M. Night Shaymallamadingdong whose last movie, The Last Airbender, was a complete failure by both fans and studio numbers. Although M. Night did not write this movie, his directing ability has slacked immensely since Signs. While this may the final shot for M. Night, this is only the beginning for Jaden Smith.
Despite what the trailer may emit to the audience, this is Jaden's movie. It is up to him to gather resources for his injured father, Will, during the entire movie. Jaden steps into the lead and will try to make a name for himself with this movie. With this and the sequel to The Karate Kid coming up, it will be interesting to see if Jaden has the ability to open up movies just like his father, or is he too inexperienced to catch our attention.
Only time will tell if this movie comes to be remembered or forgotten. Another action packed trailer should get my attention and ticket of admission, but for now, i'm reserving judgement.
The movie is directed by M. Night Shaymallamadingdong whose last movie, The Last Airbender, was a complete failure by both fans and studio numbers. Although M. Night did not write this movie, his directing ability has slacked immensely since Signs. While this may the final shot for M. Night, this is only the beginning for Jaden Smith.
Despite what the trailer may emit to the audience, this is Jaden's movie. It is up to him to gather resources for his injured father, Will, during the entire movie. Jaden steps into the lead and will try to make a name for himself with this movie. With this and the sequel to The Karate Kid coming up, it will be interesting to see if Jaden has the ability to open up movies just like his father, or is he too inexperienced to catch our attention.
Only time will tell if this movie comes to be remembered or forgotten. Another action packed trailer should get my attention and ticket of admission, but for now, i'm reserving judgement.
Monday, December 17, 2012
The Pacific Rim Job
Why have you not seen the new Pacific Rim trailer?
Oh, you have? Well, let me clarify some details that seem to be circulating around the internet. The big one is that the pilots are not in the suits, but some underground warehouse controlling via remote. THIS IS FALSE! According to the Pacific Rim official website, blue prints provided of the Jagers clearly show each Jager has situated both pilots in the head to control the Jager. This is to mimic the human brain where the right side of the brain controls the statistics and math part where the left side of the brain controls the creativity and problem solving region. The same principle applies here where two people both control the same Jager but have different functions and communicate back and forth as one unit.
The second rumor is that it is Godzilla they are fighting. FALSE AGAIN! While they call the monsters Kaiju, which is what Godzilla was originally called in the Japanese versions, it loosely translates to Giant Monster. That is what they are fighting and it is not Godzilla. These are two different categories and just to be clear, there is supposed to be another movie called Godzilla coming out at a later date. Do not be confused of these two.
Third rumor that I see going around is that this is related to Aperture Science. FALSE, but I would rather it not be. Because the voice of GLaDOS can be heard in the trailer to mimic the A.I in the Jaegers, people are already making a connection between the videogame Portal and this movie. While it is the same actor portraying the voice, these are two different worlds. Portal world is a private enterprise about improving science with new technological advances. Jaeger world is government run facilities that build these machines specifically to combat the Kaiju.
Those are the facts. If you have any problem with those, I have two fists who would disagree with you.
Oh, you have? Well, let me clarify some details that seem to be circulating around the internet. The big one is that the pilots are not in the suits, but some underground warehouse controlling via remote. THIS IS FALSE! According to the Pacific Rim official website, blue prints provided of the Jagers clearly show each Jager has situated both pilots in the head to control the Jager. This is to mimic the human brain where the right side of the brain controls the statistics and math part where the left side of the brain controls the creativity and problem solving region. The same principle applies here where two people both control the same Jager but have different functions and communicate back and forth as one unit.
The second rumor is that it is Godzilla they are fighting. FALSE AGAIN! While they call the monsters Kaiju, which is what Godzilla was originally called in the Japanese versions, it loosely translates to Giant Monster. That is what they are fighting and it is not Godzilla. These are two different categories and just to be clear, there is supposed to be another movie called Godzilla coming out at a later date. Do not be confused of these two.
Third rumor that I see going around is that this is related to Aperture Science. FALSE, but I would rather it not be. Because the voice of GLaDOS can be heard in the trailer to mimic the A.I in the Jaegers, people are already making a connection between the videogame Portal and this movie. While it is the same actor portraying the voice, these are two different worlds. Portal world is a private enterprise about improving science with new technological advances. Jaeger world is government run facilities that build these machines specifically to combat the Kaiju.
Those are the facts. If you have any problem with those, I have two fists who would disagree with you.
Friday, December 14, 2012
The Hobbit: Review
Thanks to my friends, I was able to see The Hobbit at midnight in IMAX HFR 3D 48FPS. While in the beginning I had to adjust my eyes and brain to realize that I was watching more frames than normal, which led to everything in the beginning feel fast paced for me, I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed my time watching the movie.
While the story may feel like it is dragging on, Peter Jackson is trying his best to stay true to the original source material and not cut anything out. This is truly a challenge as the book itself is long with overdrawn out side plots, all of which fall necessary when it reaches the end sequence of the entire book. This is what Peter Jackson is culminating up to.
Now, what I really like about the movie is the visuals. While I did see it running at 48FPS, the amount of detail that goes into this movie is amazing. From costumes to backgrounds, everything is cautiously picked out and placed according to the book. At times, the amount of CG on screen is not too overwhelming at times, however, when the chase sequence takes place near the end of the film, you can definitely see all the CG with the long camera swoops into the action.
I thoroughly enjoyed this new 48FPS viewing and expect to see more movies coming out that excel to this level of quality when using this production technique.
While the story may feel like it is dragging on, Peter Jackson is trying his best to stay true to the original source material and not cut anything out. This is truly a challenge as the book itself is long with overdrawn out side plots, all of which fall necessary when it reaches the end sequence of the entire book. This is what Peter Jackson is culminating up to.
Now, what I really like about the movie is the visuals. While I did see it running at 48FPS, the amount of detail that goes into this movie is amazing. From costumes to backgrounds, everything is cautiously picked out and placed according to the book. At times, the amount of CG on screen is not too overwhelming at times, however, when the chase sequence takes place near the end of the film, you can definitely see all the CG with the long camera swoops into the action.
I thoroughly enjoyed this new 48FPS viewing and expect to see more movies coming out that excel to this level of quality when using this production technique.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Return to Middle Earth
Time to go back to Middle Earth and watch The Hobbit starting at midnight. Be sure to see it the way it was meant to be seen: in IMAX 3D HFR. That is how director Peter Jackson envisioned the film to look and that's how it should be viewed.
But in other news, while you're watching the film, be sure to check out the trailers for Man of Steel, Oblivion, and Pacific Rim. All of which are Warner Bros. pictures coming out next year and all of which will be shown prior to The Hobbit.
And don't forget that if you catch the film in IMAX, you will be treated to the first 10 minutes of the upcoming Star Trek movie as well as the new trailer.
But in other news, while you're watching the film, be sure to check out the trailers for Man of Steel, Oblivion, and Pacific Rim. All of which are Warner Bros. pictures coming out next year and all of which will be shown prior to The Hobbit.
And don't forget that if you catch the film in IMAX, you will be treated to the first 10 minutes of the upcoming Star Trek movie as well as the new trailer.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
No interest here
I think i've had enough of Johnny Depp for my tastes. After his stint as Willy Wonka, it seems that his characters are all the same with different make-up. However, this is not why I have no interest in his latest project.
More to the reason is that Depp is not the main character of the film, yet he is being promoted as such in all the posters and trailers. The story is not Depp's and therefore this is misleading to the point that it mimics "Alice in Wonderland" where he played the Madd Hatter and was barely in it because it was not his story to be told. I feel the same thing is going on here.
Finally, I have seen nobody clammer for this movie to happen. Nobody has ever said they wish they would turn the old tv show into a modern film. This project seems to be coming out of nowhere and because of that, there is nothing pushing me to go see it. The topics are not current and the feel of the film is too old for even kids to connect with.
You have failed Lone Ranger.
More to the reason is that Depp is not the main character of the film, yet he is being promoted as such in all the posters and trailers. The story is not Depp's and therefore this is misleading to the point that it mimics "Alice in Wonderland" where he played the Madd Hatter and was barely in it because it was not his story to be told. I feel the same thing is going on here.
Finally, I have seen nobody clammer for this movie to happen. Nobody has ever said they wish they would turn the old tv show into a modern film. This project seems to be coming out of nowhere and because of that, there is nothing pushing me to go see it. The topics are not current and the feel of the film is too old for even kids to connect with.
You have failed Lone Ranger.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Waiting for Superman
The new trailer for "Man of Steel" has been unleashed online and it looks amazing. It has a "The Dark Knight" feel to it from an obvious input of Christopher Nolan as Executive Producer on the project, but the true calling is in the action sequences that are few and far between.
Director Zack Snyder won the job of directing "Man of Steel" because of his directorial ability in "300" and "Watchmen" both of which were visually stunning movies. However, the true essence of those movies lied in its action sequences where the fights were sped up for fast paced in your face style and slowed down for a dramatic tone defining effect. These visuals are whats missing from the trailer and I feel what is keeping audiences on the fence about the film.
I feel the marketing team is keeping those out of play in order to bait us into wanting more out of "Man of Steel" but at the same time it is putting people off as it lays in the aftermath of what Christopher Nolan has done and seen as a carbon copy. While it should be said that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, I feel that if the third trailer does not produce action sequences, expect the turnout for this movie to be poor.
Director Zack Snyder won the job of directing "Man of Steel" because of his directorial ability in "300" and "Watchmen" both of which were visually stunning movies. However, the true essence of those movies lied in its action sequences where the fights were sped up for fast paced in your face style and slowed down for a dramatic tone defining effect. These visuals are whats missing from the trailer and I feel what is keeping audiences on the fence about the film.
I feel the marketing team is keeping those out of play in order to bait us into wanting more out of "Man of Steel" but at the same time it is putting people off as it lays in the aftermath of what Christopher Nolan has done and seen as a carbon copy. While it should be said that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, I feel that if the third trailer does not produce action sequences, expect the turnout for this movie to be poor.
Monday, December 10, 2012
IMAX 3D HFR 48 FPS
I'm talking tech specs today. Specifically "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" as Peter Jackson has decided to shoot The Hobbit in 48 frames per second. A normal movie is shot at 24 frames per second giving it the film look we know and have become accustomed to. So when there are twice as many frames added in each second of the film, you give a more fluid look and not a lot of blur with objects in motion.
This high frame rate allows a more realistic look many people are not ready for. When 3D is added upon that, you get people who succumb to migraines and head aches from watching the movie. These people have so used to seeing a flat 2D image that they are unable to adjust to the new imaging of the film in such a high frame rate.
Click here if you want to see The Hobbit as it was shot and meant to be seen.
This high frame rate allows a more realistic look many people are not ready for. When 3D is added upon that, you get people who succumb to migraines and head aches from watching the movie. These people have so used to seeing a flat 2D image that they are unable to adjust to the new imaging of the film in such a high frame rate.
Click here if you want to see The Hobbit as it was shot and meant to be seen.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Promoting, so you should check it out
I've been a fan of youtuber Peter Rallis who has been doing Movie Buzz for several years now and has finally branched off into his own website which can be viewed here.
This breaks up large articles of information into what's relevant and how it effects movies with his own review and summarization. I personally find his reviews blunt and to the point of why they are important and how it effects production of a movie. There are also clips and trailers that are posted as the they are released online which is kept up-to-date.
He is where I find my news to comment on, so if you want a head start on what I would potentially be talking about, be sure to check out his website and bookmark it.
This breaks up large articles of information into what's relevant and how it effects movies with his own review and summarization. I personally find his reviews blunt and to the point of why they are important and how it effects production of a movie. There are also clips and trailers that are posted as the they are released online which is kept up-to-date.
He is where I find my news to comment on, so if you want a head start on what I would potentially be talking about, be sure to check out his website and bookmark it.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
"May the force be ever in your favor" - Patrick Stewart as Gandalf in Stargate: The Next Generation
Click Here
Now enjoy the teaser trailer for the real trailer that will be premiering next week. Fans rejoice as the long overdue and posponed film finally arrives. It's on a big scale and all the key players are back. The adventure will push our hero to the brink as the world comes crumbling down.
That all sounds very vague, but that is essentially what we have when it comes to tentpole films. You can't really criticize it because it will deliver what is expected. It's not trying to be an oscar film and it's not going to suck balls. Even if it does suck balls, there will still be enough money behind it to succeed and a small base of fans who like what they did.
Now that sounds pretty vague too. My point being that no matter what the audience says they want to see, the studios will continue to make these big budget pictures with lots of effects to garner an income that we provide. And it's a lucrative business. Who can argue with that money making model?
Now enjoy the teaser trailer for the real trailer that will be premiering next week. Fans rejoice as the long overdue and posponed film finally arrives. It's on a big scale and all the key players are back. The adventure will push our hero to the brink as the world comes crumbling down.
That all sounds very vague, but that is essentially what we have when it comes to tentpole films. You can't really criticize it because it will deliver what is expected. It's not trying to be an oscar film and it's not going to suck balls. Even if it does suck balls, there will still be enough money behind it to succeed and a small base of fans who like what they did.
Now that sounds pretty vague too. My point being that no matter what the audience says they want to see, the studios will continue to make these big budget pictures with lots of effects to garner an income that we provide. And it's a lucrative business. Who can argue with that money making model?
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Iconic Cars
My favorite movie car of all time is the DeLorean from Back to the Future. I want it. Period. If possible, I would like to add the hover conversion and fly off (Actual time travel is also welcomed). Now, I do not have the time or skill to make my own, so I have made it my mission to save enough money to buy it off someone who has already made it. I haven't looked yet, but I know that there are actual conventions that DeLorean conventions that people attend and bring their time machine (youtube).
If you have a favorite movie car, don't feel like owning that may be out of reach. All you have to do is set aside x-amount of money from each paycheck and you'll have a good start. Salary dependent, if you save $100 from each paycheck, after one year, based off bi-weekly payment, you will have $2,500 saved up after one year. Now keep that going for ten years and you have $25,000. A good start for when you're young like me.
That's the 40 year goal for me. By the time I reach the age of 50, I want to own the DeLorean. I feel like this is easily accessible so long as I stick to the plan and meet my goal. Any extra cash I get can also go towards these funds. If you would like to contribute to my dream, I will gladly accept your contributions and provide you with a ride once I acquire my time machine.
If you have a favorite movie car, don't feel like owning that may be out of reach. All you have to do is set aside x-amount of money from each paycheck and you'll have a good start. Salary dependent, if you save $100 from each paycheck, after one year, based off bi-weekly payment, you will have $2,500 saved up after one year. Now keep that going for ten years and you have $25,000. A good start for when you're young like me.
That's the 40 year goal for me. By the time I reach the age of 50, I want to own the DeLorean. I feel like this is easily accessible so long as I stick to the plan and meet my goal. Any extra cash I get can also go towards these funds. If you would like to contribute to my dream, I will gladly accept your contributions and provide you with a ride once I acquire my time machine.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Disney & Netflix sitting in a tree...
Disney and Netflix have come to the conclusion that you need more Disney in your life. This is why starting in 2016, you will be able to stream all Disney all the time through Netflix. Including movies from the vault that were "locked up" are now going to be free to stream to everybody.
But wait there's more! The films included are not just Disney Animation, but every property that Disney owns. This means Pixar, Marvel, and Miramax films are all going to be on Netflix. Now how long the movies stay active is yet to be known, but you will get these new movies coming to a TV/Computer/Tablet/Phone near you!
But wait there's more! The films included are not just Disney Animation, but every property that Disney owns. This means Pixar, Marvel, and Miramax films are all going to be on Netflix. Now how long the movies stay active is yet to be known, but you will get these new movies coming to a TV/Computer/Tablet/Phone near you!
Monday, December 3, 2012
In the Edit Bay
I am going to try an type this withh as few mistakes as pisssible without pressing the delte key.
I have a probelm when it comes to typing. Apperntly I cannot type vew well and that have severely effected my work. I type really fast becaseu I cannot type sa fast as i can think and thus i am off to eh the next work before i finish this one/ This is not to say that I am incomprible but that I am used to autocorrect to fix my istakes that I sumeitmes don't look at twhat im typing until its too late.
As you cah tell I am not loking this one bit but if you are able to read therough all fo this, then you too have a smart person brani that can comprehend what i am sayig. This quick typing has effected my wrok as I alway s have typos in my titles. This is why it is good to have a second pair of eyes in teh edit bay why can look at your mistakes and correct you when you are too tired or are unable to type correctly like me. Sometimes the mistakes are simple like typing the the for the eth and othertimes it is big where i cannot spell a rowd correctly and rely on autocorrect to help me out.
I fyou hav ethis problem, I suggest typing out more than you can handle in order to accomodate your knowlege of keys and words s so this doesnt happen to you.
Friday, November 30, 2012
There's only one story to tell
For writers,
When coming up with a screenplay, just remember that change always makes for a good movie. The purpose of a film to make the main character change over the course of the film. They start in one direction and throughout the film we see the decisions that they make and the changes that effect them to mold them into a completely different person by the end of the film.
To make is more simple, start them off as the best person in the world, but they don't like (blank). Through a series of meetings and mishaps, this person begins to (blank) in order to change their ways to become a better (or worse) person than when they began. This makes everything simple, yet can be made into a very complex string of instruments.
Now go back to that script you thought was good and make sure the main character changes throughout the course of the story. They should be two completely different people from the beginning of the story to the end.
Sincerely,
Future Film Guy
When coming up with a screenplay, just remember that change always makes for a good movie. The purpose of a film to make the main character change over the course of the film. They start in one direction and throughout the film we see the decisions that they make and the changes that effect them to mold them into a completely different person by the end of the film.
To make is more simple, start them off as the best person in the world, but they don't like (blank). Through a series of meetings and mishaps, this person begins to (blank) in order to change their ways to become a better (or worse) person than when they began. This makes everything simple, yet can be made into a very complex string of instruments.
Now go back to that script you thought was good and make sure the main character changes throughout the course of the story. They should be two completely different people from the beginning of the story to the end.
Sincerely,
Future Film Guy
Thursday, November 29, 2012
LIVE! FROM THE WARNER BROS. LOT.....
It's time for Animaniacs! And we're zany to the max. So just sit back and relax, you'll laugh till you collapse; it's ANIMANIACS!
Such a good cartoon that seem to get better with age. You can find just about every episode online in some place or another. Most likely Youtube, but for special ones (*StarWars*) you have to do some searching.
Watching them now after years of being off the air, they have a certain nostalgia about them that bring back fond memories of a childhood. However, if you watch them back now, you understand more of the jokes because you have a wider view of the world. For instance, all of the "Rita and Runt" pieces revolve around musicals while the Animaniacs parody just about every movie made (up to that time) stretching from "Citizen Kane" to "Forrest Gump." Then you have Slappy the Squirrel where violence is the centerpiece, and Pinky and the Brain as they try to take over the world.
The writers on this series were excellent at finding ways of pushing the boundary, specifically the sexual innuendos. Whenever you see Yakko break the fourth wall by turning to the audience and saying "good night everybody" means that there was just a sexual innuendo said. Not to mention all the musical numbers done for every episode, the voice actors on the series were very musical gifted. From musical lyrics parody to Yakko's World, the songs are very catchy as well as funny.
If you did not grow up on the Animaniacs, go watch some and, as the shows beginning goes, "...sit back and relax, you'll laugh till you collapse."
Such a good cartoon that seem to get better with age. You can find just about every episode online in some place or another. Most likely Youtube, but for special ones (*StarWars*) you have to do some searching.
Watching them now after years of being off the air, they have a certain nostalgia about them that bring back fond memories of a childhood. However, if you watch them back now, you understand more of the jokes because you have a wider view of the world. For instance, all of the "Rita and Runt" pieces revolve around musicals while the Animaniacs parody just about every movie made (up to that time) stretching from "Citizen Kane" to "Forrest Gump." Then you have Slappy the Squirrel where violence is the centerpiece, and Pinky and the Brain as they try to take over the world.
The writers on this series were excellent at finding ways of pushing the boundary, specifically the sexual innuendos. Whenever you see Yakko break the fourth wall by turning to the audience and saying "good night everybody" means that there was just a sexual innuendo said. Not to mention all the musical numbers done for every episode, the voice actors on the series were very musical gifted. From musical lyrics parody to Yakko's World, the songs are very catchy as well as funny.
If you did not grow up on the Animaniacs, go watch some and, as the shows beginning goes, "...sit back and relax, you'll laugh till you collapse."
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
HOW TO WIN THE OSCAR: Screenplay
It's Oscar season and I will providing a view on the different ways one can win the Golden Statue.
Today is the screenplay.
There are two different types of wins that fall under this category: the adapted and the original. Adapted screenplay is a written work that has been turned into a movie. This where you see "based on" in the opening credits of a movie. This is much easier to be categorized in, as there is already a source material to which you can reference if you get lost in your own work. These tend to be easier to write and as such are much harder critiqued since there is something to reference where it is written poorly for an adaptation.
On the other side is the original screenplay. This can be easier or harder depending on the genre you write about. Since there is no subcategory, everything from comedy to drama is clumped into here making the competition a lot more fierce, but also stiff. It is tough to come up with an original concept and even harder to get that to the screen. The idea not only has to resonate with the executives at a studio, but also a director who has a keen eye for the story you are telling. Which is why most original screenplay writers are also the directors of their works. They wrote it, so they know how the shots are going to look on screen before anything else.
If however you become unlucky enough to have your screenplay made into a movie, don't be discouraged. There is a list that comes out every year titled "The Black List" which is not as scary as it may sound. This is a list writers want to be on. It means that executives like your script, but for one thing or another it just never made it to production. Most scripts that end up on this list are made within a year or two because they attract attention from being on the list.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Wrecking Crew
I finally saw Wreck-it Ralph this past weekend.
Not before I had to endure the long and painfully funny Breaking Dawn pt. 2 for my sister. I'm not sure if this makes me a good guy or a traiter, but I did it for my sister so don't judge. My reaction was more laughable than just about everybody else.
Even though the movie is passable to be called a movie, I was still laughing at it. The funniest part has to be the end fight sequence. That non-blood bloody mess was by far the most laughable part. You have vampires killing each other, basically dwindling their own numbers only to end up being a dream-like sequence. In a movie where talking bull-shit occurs everywhere and nothing gets done, the one shining glimmer of action turns out to be as fake as the wolves. On a side note, those were some ugly vampires.
Wreck-It Ralph, on the other hand, is a great film. Plenty of cultural references and a well written story. The best animated film since Toy Story 3. Don't think it's just for video game people only. This is not a movie for kids either. This movie is rated E for everybody.
Go see it. That is all.
Not before I had to endure the long and painfully funny Breaking Dawn pt. 2 for my sister. I'm not sure if this makes me a good guy or a traiter, but I did it for my sister so don't judge. My reaction was more laughable than just about everybody else.
Even though the movie is passable to be called a movie, I was still laughing at it. The funniest part has to be the end fight sequence. That non-blood bloody mess was by far the most laughable part. You have vampires killing each other, basically dwindling their own numbers only to end up being a dream-like sequence. In a movie where talking bull-shit occurs everywhere and nothing gets done, the one shining glimmer of action turns out to be as fake as the wolves. On a side note, those were some ugly vampires.
Wreck-It Ralph, on the other hand, is a great film. Plenty of cultural references and a well written story. The best animated film since Toy Story 3. Don't think it's just for video game people only. This is not a movie for kids either. This movie is rated E for everybody.
Go see it. That is all.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Thanks-Giving
The next four days tend to be a high attendance number at the movie theater. This is what movie studios call "Thanks-Giving" where they thank you for giving them profits over four days. Now while some of you will go see that Twilight movie, the rest of us can either catch up on some great movies like Wreck-It Ralph, Skyfall, or Argo while enjoying some newer releases like Lincoln, Silver Linings Playbook, or Rise of the Guardians.
The Studios have carefully planned out which movies to be released so when this weekend comes, there is a variety of movies, enough for every kind of person out there. So I encourage you to go out and not spend money on that Twilight movie, but instead catch up on some great releases while taking a look at the most recent ones. Oscar Season is hitting its stride right now and that means deep thoughtful movies are coming out.
Go see a movie you feel is worthy of the Oscar and support it because if you don't then Twilight makes more money, and nobody wants that. (except for Summit Entertainment)
The Studios have carefully planned out which movies to be released so when this weekend comes, there is a variety of movies, enough for every kind of person out there. So I encourage you to go out and not spend money on that Twilight movie, but instead catch up on some great releases while taking a look at the most recent ones. Oscar Season is hitting its stride right now and that means deep thoughtful movies are coming out.
Go see a movie you feel is worthy of the Oscar and support it because if you don't then Twilight makes more money, and nobody wants that. (except for Summit Entertainment)
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
My Precious.....Yes....My Prequel....
See you at midnight.
I don't think I've talked about "Lord of the Rings "[LOTR] and the upcoming first part in the new trilogy "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" [Hobbit]. Mostly because I am not invested as much into that universe as Star Wars or Marvel (see previous post) but for the main reason, I have not seen the LOTR Trilogy beginning to end.
Before you start telling me to see them, I will tell you that I already plan on seeing this new installment at midnight for other reasons. For starters, this is a Warner Bros. movie and as such, they will undoubtably be playing their own trailers, promoting their upcoming movies before the movie. This is what has me interested.
The first trailer I plan to confirm being there is the new "Man of Steel" trailer. The previous trailer that premiered in front of "The Dark Knight Rises" did not provide much in regards to story but rather set a tone for the movie. This trailer had some fans skeptical about whether Zack Snyder was the right call for the Director. Warner Bros. needs to premier a new trailer that will get people excited for this movie is they have any chance of bringing together a Justice League movie.
The second trailer is for the new Star Trek movie. Filming is still going on and so far it has been confirmed that a new trailer will be premiering in front of Hobbit. But that's not the only news about Star Trek. It is rumored [possibly confirmed] that Warner Bros. is pulling a TDKR Prologue stunt in front of Hobbit, just like TDKR did with "Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol" last year. This will be showing the first 10 minutes of Star Trek 2 in IMAX screens only followed by the trailer everybody else will be seeing. This alone is definitely going to bring out the fan base and sell tickets.
The third reason I will be seeing it at midnight is not a trailer but the actual movie itself. "But wait, you said weren't invested into that universe. Just look above." I know what I said, and I am seeing this movie for the film production. In select theaters (AMC) they will be showing Hobbit at 48FPS, as it was intended, on the IMAX projected screens ONLY. I want to see first hand what all the commotion is about over it being "too realistic" for a movie experience. Click here to see the list of theaters showing the 48FPS.
But most of all I'm seeing it for my friend because that's the kind of person I am. I'm a good friend like that. See you at midnight.
I don't think I've talked about "Lord of the Rings "[LOTR] and the upcoming first part in the new trilogy "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" [Hobbit]. Mostly because I am not invested as much into that universe as Star Wars or Marvel (see previous post) but for the main reason, I have not seen the LOTR Trilogy beginning to end.
Before you start telling me to see them, I will tell you that I already plan on seeing this new installment at midnight for other reasons. For starters, this is a Warner Bros. movie and as such, they will undoubtably be playing their own trailers, promoting their upcoming movies before the movie. This is what has me interested.
The first trailer I plan to confirm being there is the new "Man of Steel" trailer. The previous trailer that premiered in front of "The Dark Knight Rises" did not provide much in regards to story but rather set a tone for the movie. This trailer had some fans skeptical about whether Zack Snyder was the right call for the Director. Warner Bros. needs to premier a new trailer that will get people excited for this movie is they have any chance of bringing together a Justice League movie.
The second trailer is for the new Star Trek movie. Filming is still going on and so far it has been confirmed that a new trailer will be premiering in front of Hobbit. But that's not the only news about Star Trek. It is rumored [possibly confirmed] that Warner Bros. is pulling a TDKR Prologue stunt in front of Hobbit, just like TDKR did with "Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol" last year. This will be showing the first 10 minutes of Star Trek 2 in IMAX screens only followed by the trailer everybody else will be seeing. This alone is definitely going to bring out the fan base and sell tickets.
The third reason I will be seeing it at midnight is not a trailer but the actual movie itself. "But wait, you said weren't invested into that universe. Just look above." I know what I said, and I am seeing this movie for the film production. In select theaters (AMC) they will be showing Hobbit at 48FPS, as it was intended, on the IMAX projected screens ONLY. I want to see first hand what all the commotion is about over it being "too realistic" for a movie experience. Click here to see the list of theaters showing the 48FPS.
But most of all I'm seeing it for my friend because that's the kind of person I am. I'm a good friend like that. See you at midnight.
Monday, November 19, 2012
30 for 30
I love sports. I also love ESPN. That being said, I love Disney, but more specifically ESPN.
Since 2009, ESPN has made these "30 for 30" ESPN films. They don't just look at sports as a winner and loser, but rather delves deeper into the context behind players and teams. These films are available to watch on Netflix on demand. If you have not watched them, you should stop reading and watch one. They have an abundance of different topics ranging from hockey to football and rugby to boxing.
The concept behind them is simple: Take film directors and apply their story telling skills on an unseen aspect of sports history. Some of my favorite are "Kings Ransom" chronicling the trade of Wayne Gretzky to the L.A. Kings, "Four Days in October" where the Boston Red Socks came back 0-3 to beat the New York Yankees in 2004, and "Broke" which explores the windfall athletes come into when signing these big deals out of college and their mismanagement of income.
These "30 for 30" stories tell compelling sides about what happens when the cameras stop rolling and the back side deals people make for fortune. ESPN has done an excellent job in creating these films brining emotion and a fresh perspective to the stories you thought you knew and a light on some you never did.
I applaud ESPN for making these films and I wish they continue to make them. Originally, there were only going to be 30 films made (hence the title) but I wish they continue this route as most stories provide courage and triumph to compelling stories. If you have not seen any of these films, I highly recommend you make it a point to see these films.
Since 2009, ESPN has made these "30 for 30" ESPN films. They don't just look at sports as a winner and loser, but rather delves deeper into the context behind players and teams. These films are available to watch on Netflix on demand. If you have not watched them, you should stop reading and watch one. They have an abundance of different topics ranging from hockey to football and rugby to boxing.
The concept behind them is simple: Take film directors and apply their story telling skills on an unseen aspect of sports history. Some of my favorite are "Kings Ransom" chronicling the trade of Wayne Gretzky to the L.A. Kings, "Four Days in October" where the Boston Red Socks came back 0-3 to beat the New York Yankees in 2004, and "Broke" which explores the windfall athletes come into when signing these big deals out of college and their mismanagement of income.
These "30 for 30" stories tell compelling sides about what happens when the cameras stop rolling and the back side deals people make for fortune. ESPN has done an excellent job in creating these films brining emotion and a fresh perspective to the stories you thought you knew and a light on some you never did.
I applaud ESPN for making these films and I wish they continue to make them. Originally, there were only going to be 30 films made (hence the title) but I wish they continue this route as most stories provide courage and triumph to compelling stories. If you have not seen any of these films, I highly recommend you make it a point to see these films.
Friday, November 16, 2012
It's so bad it makes money
What sucks, yet makes money? It completely terrible, yet adored by millions? An internet joke and a best seller? Something guys hate and girls love?
If you were thinking about cats, you and I are on the same page. Oh, you thought I meant the Twilight movies? Yes, that applies here too.
Another Twilight movie has descended upon us, but gratefully it is the last movie. I have to admit, I have seen the first movie Twilight when it was in theaters. It was a painful experience. I was laughing so hard it caused my sides to ache. Since then I have seen these movies as one bad joke. The acting is stale while the pace is too long for its own good.
The main character is a shell of a person with no real goal other than to bang a vampire. The villain does everything to try and stop that from happening. Everyone in between tries to convince everybody else that they are stupid for trying this. All meanwhile the love interest doesn't want to bang the main girl because he is 108 years old and she is 16.
This movie is a great abstinence tool for young girls in that it shows you don't need sex for a relationship, but then again it also says to fall in love with a vampire and meet his family, all of whom would suck your blood at a moments notice. So the moral of the story is "If you can't eat it, marry it."
As for why it makes money? Simple. It's cheap to make with cheap effects and has a cult following large enough to form an army. They will buy tickets even if it sucks and they will not admit that it sucks because it is "their movie" while everyone else just doesn't understand.
If you were thinking about cats, you and I are on the same page. Oh, you thought I meant the Twilight movies? Yes, that applies here too.
Another Twilight movie has descended upon us, but gratefully it is the last movie. I have to admit, I have seen the first movie Twilight when it was in theaters. It was a painful experience. I was laughing so hard it caused my sides to ache. Since then I have seen these movies as one bad joke. The acting is stale while the pace is too long for its own good.
The main character is a shell of a person with no real goal other than to bang a vampire. The villain does everything to try and stop that from happening. Everyone in between tries to convince everybody else that they are stupid for trying this. All meanwhile the love interest doesn't want to bang the main girl because he is 108 years old and she is 16.
This movie is a great abstinence tool for young girls in that it shows you don't need sex for a relationship, but then again it also says to fall in love with a vampire and meet his family, all of whom would suck your blood at a moments notice. So the moral of the story is "If you can't eat it, marry it."
As for why it makes money? Simple. It's cheap to make with cheap effects and has a cult following large enough to form an army. They will buy tickets even if it sucks and they will not admit that it sucks because it is "their movie" while everyone else just doesn't understand.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
HOW TO WIN THE OSCAR: Acting
It's Oscar season and I will providing a view on the different ways one can win the Golden Statue.
Today is Acting.
Whether it's in a lead or supporting, a win is a win and an Oscar is still an Oscar. Now, in theory, you can win both the lead and supporting in a single year, but that has never been accomplished. 13 actors came close with two nominations in the same year, but never won both at the same time. This is not due to them being good in one role and bad in another. This is mainly because of Oscar politics.
Oscar politics consist of not only who deserves it for the role, but who of the nominees will be able to win the award again. Some great young actors get passed up on winning to older actors because the academy feels it is "their turn" to win. That after years of working in the business, the one Oscar is a kind of "bone" thrown to them for their years of service.
This kind of "help" downplays the pride of winning an Oscar and loses the respect of the audience watching at home. Nobody should win because due to age, but rather win because you cannot see past the character into the actor. They have completely immersed themselves into the universe of the movie that when you walk out of the theater you think "That was the same same person as this other role" or something along those lines.
That surprise you get from watching a powerful performance should always win the Oscar. Not age. But, the other way to win the Oscar is to play a historical figure with a commanding performance. Or be casted in a World War II movie as the lead. The Academy has weak knees for killing Hitler and that's been shown several times over in the nominations.
I have just come up with the perfect lead guaranteed to win an Oscar. A Tuskegee air pilot who comes from a cotton picking family to out work all his racist white peers and lead them into a WWII air raid over Nazi occupied Germany, where in his plane crashes behind enemy lines and he must fight his way to kill Hitler, end the war, and reunite with his family only to be stopped short of his goal. It shall be called ANGEL WINGS. [copyright]
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Who is sexy?
Channing Tatum.
Well, for this year anyways. The recently crowned "Sexiest Man Alive" winner thought it was a joke when somebody told him. I can see that. He doesn't find himself to be sexy, and if it wasn't for "Magic Mike" he probably wouldn't have been crowned.
So this comes down to the shallow notion that looks are everything. While yes, they aren't, but people sill classify and group people based on looks. This writing has lost all meaning. I don't know where I was going with this. I know where I wanted it to end up. So keep reading and I'll get there.
Women always complain about guys judging girls based on their looks. Well that double standard has come around and this proves it. Having women judge men in naming Channing Tatum "Sexy" based on his roles. Ah, that was the thought. Good old double standard and who is willing to bear all on screen. If was a contest based on nudity, then Michael Fastbender should have won for his portrayal in "Shame."
So there you go. Women, let us men judge our women and you can have Channing Tatum as your own. We men really don't see what's to like about him until the new GI JOE comes out after being post converted to 3D. That's what this is about. GI JOE because it was supposed to have already come out and I bet that would have dashed his chances at being crowned.
Well, for this year anyways. The recently crowned "Sexiest Man Alive" winner thought it was a joke when somebody told him. I can see that. He doesn't find himself to be sexy, and if it wasn't for "Magic Mike" he probably wouldn't have been crowned.
So this comes down to the shallow notion that looks are everything. While yes, they aren't, but people sill classify and group people based on looks. This writing has lost all meaning. I don't know where I was going with this. I know where I wanted it to end up. So keep reading and I'll get there.
Women always complain about guys judging girls based on their looks. Well that double standard has come around and this proves it. Having women judge men in naming Channing Tatum "Sexy" based on his roles. Ah, that was the thought. Good old double standard and who is willing to bear all on screen. If was a contest based on nudity, then Michael Fastbender should have won for his portrayal in "Shame."
So there you go. Women, let us men judge our women and you can have Channing Tatum as your own. We men really don't see what's to like about him until the new GI JOE comes out after being post converted to 3D. That's what this is about. GI JOE because it was supposed to have already come out and I bet that would have dashed his chances at being crowned.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
In a Galaxy far, far away.....John Carter!!!
"Nobody wants to be remembered as the guy who 'Shit the Bed' excuse the expression" as quoted by Justin Timberlake in Friends with Benefits [a far better movie than No Strings Attached]. This is why famous directors have been passing up the opportunity to take on Star Wars. I feel that Disney is going with an in-house director at the helm, but first I must regress into why Lucas sold everything to Disney [or how I feel everything went down].
John Carter is the reason behind the deal. Lucas has had a long standing relationship with Disney [See Star Tours at Disneyland] where in he was almost certain to giving Disney the keys to the franchise, however, there is also his long time friend Steven Spielberg over at DreamWorks who he also could have sold it to. Bring in John Carter.
Those who have read "A Princess of Mars" by Edgar Rice Burroughs [source material for John Carter] believe that this is the closest thing to Star Wars that pre-dates Star Wars. This movie was made as a challenge to Disney from Lucas not only to see if they can be faithful to the original source material, but also if they are able to make it their own in order to have Lucas trust them with his beloved franchise.
Enter 2010 when preliminary filming began on John Carter and its release in 2012. Yes, John Carter is considered to be a Box Office flop, but if you look at the numbers, it made its money back with an extra $32 million. While that may seem like a lot, it's pennies compared to the $250 million budget.
Now, if you've seen John Carter [chances are you didn't] it is noteworthy that the script is pretty good in accomplishing a complete story arc and being a well drafted screenplay. Where it failed was in marketing. John Carter was not a big enough name to attract a big audience, but Star Wars is.
Having been made in a 2 year time span, this leaves room for a Star Wars movie to be possible in May 2015 if they get cameras rolling no later than Summer 2013. I say May 2015 because previous Star Wars movies have been released mid May and Disney would most likely keep that date for Star Wars fans.
As for who would direct such a movie, my money is on Brad Bird. A good friend at Pixar, who made The Incredibles, and directed Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol. He is still a relatively unknown name when it comes to Directors, but he is good at what he does. He is an in-house director for Disney where in they don't have to pay much for him to direct Star Wars, but has a great execution on finishing with great products and fan fair.
John Carter is the reason behind the deal. Lucas has had a long standing relationship with Disney [See Star Tours at Disneyland] where in he was almost certain to giving Disney the keys to the franchise, however, there is also his long time friend Steven Spielberg over at DreamWorks who he also could have sold it to. Bring in John Carter.
Those who have read "A Princess of Mars" by Edgar Rice Burroughs [source material for John Carter] believe that this is the closest thing to Star Wars that pre-dates Star Wars. This movie was made as a challenge to Disney from Lucas not only to see if they can be faithful to the original source material, but also if they are able to make it their own in order to have Lucas trust them with his beloved franchise.
Enter 2010 when preliminary filming began on John Carter and its release in 2012. Yes, John Carter is considered to be a Box Office flop, but if you look at the numbers, it made its money back with an extra $32 million. While that may seem like a lot, it's pennies compared to the $250 million budget.
Now, if you've seen John Carter [chances are you didn't] it is noteworthy that the script is pretty good in accomplishing a complete story arc and being a well drafted screenplay. Where it failed was in marketing. John Carter was not a big enough name to attract a big audience, but Star Wars is.
Having been made in a 2 year time span, this leaves room for a Star Wars movie to be possible in May 2015 if they get cameras rolling no later than Summer 2013. I say May 2015 because previous Star Wars movies have been released mid May and Disney would most likely keep that date for Star Wars fans.
As for who would direct such a movie, my money is on Brad Bird. A good friend at Pixar, who made The Incredibles, and directed Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol. He is still a relatively unknown name when it comes to Directors, but he is good at what he does. He is an in-house director for Disney where in they don't have to pay much for him to direct Star Wars, but has a great execution on finishing with great products and fan fair.
Monday, November 12, 2012
Bond. Bail Bond.
I saw Skyfall over this past weekend. While watching it, the movie began to comment not only on itself, but on the progression of Bond over the past 50 years since he first graced the silver screen. That's right. Bond has been killing the bad guys, killing his drinks, and being a lady killer longer than any other franchise. James Bond's killing spree spans over 5 decades and to put that in perspective, the first Bond movie came out before Neil Armstrong stepped foot on the moon.
From Dr. No to Skyfall, Bond the film history of Bond has changed dramatically over the years. From the campy spy films of the 60's, to the bright colors of the 70's and the multiple explosions of the 80's, with the stylized look of the 90's culminating to a more realistic look through the 00's James Bond films have changed just as much as the man in the suit. The mystique of Bond transcends even that of a spy. He is a lifestyle. A dream people wish they could become. With that being said, the evil he encounters mirrors that of the current decade the film resides.
Back track to my original thought, Skyfall began commenting on its change of villains. No longer is it some mad man with infinite supply of money, guns, and gadgets who is trying to hold the world hostage, but a single person with a single idea and the will to execute it. That is the real villain. It's no longer about what flag is supported or what nation they are backing. The world evil has become about individualism and the power one man can have with the right tools and a wrong moral compus.
This leaves me to believe that anybody around us can be the evil villain we all wish we weren't. Technology has abled us to gain personal information more readily than ever before. People now live their lives through the internet and have become so technology dependent that some of the worlds most evil people are actually the ones who keep us logged in and tuned out. [I'm looking at you Zuckerburg].
Now, this may be true, and it may be fantasy dreamed up in my head, but either way, I agree with Skyfall's commentary that we should be more cautious about our enemies because they do not exercise restraint in their ways. They are free to go about and target whom they wish. So, in the terms of the British: Keep Calm and Carry On.
From Dr. No to Skyfall, Bond the film history of Bond has changed dramatically over the years. From the campy spy films of the 60's, to the bright colors of the 70's and the multiple explosions of the 80's, with the stylized look of the 90's culminating to a more realistic look through the 00's James Bond films have changed just as much as the man in the suit. The mystique of Bond transcends even that of a spy. He is a lifestyle. A dream people wish they could become. With that being said, the evil he encounters mirrors that of the current decade the film resides.
Back track to my original thought, Skyfall began commenting on its change of villains. No longer is it some mad man with infinite supply of money, guns, and gadgets who is trying to hold the world hostage, but a single person with a single idea and the will to execute it. That is the real villain. It's no longer about what flag is supported or what nation they are backing. The world evil has become about individualism and the power one man can have with the right tools and a wrong moral compus.
This leaves me to believe that anybody around us can be the evil villain we all wish we weren't. Technology has abled us to gain personal information more readily than ever before. People now live their lives through the internet and have become so technology dependent that some of the worlds most evil people are actually the ones who keep us logged in and tuned out. [I'm looking at you Zuckerburg].
Now, this may be true, and it may be fantasy dreamed up in my head, but either way, I agree with Skyfall's commentary that we should be more cautious about our enemies because they do not exercise restraint in their ways. They are free to go about and target whom they wish. So, in the terms of the British: Keep Calm and Carry On.
Friday, November 9, 2012
Can I HAZ ZombieZ???
Zombies! Zombies!! Zombies!!!
The trailer for World War Z has been unleashed to the world. Go watch it now. Yes, stop reading and go watch it. You know where to find it. Are you back? Yes? Good. On we go. And yes, I did say unleashed because these Zombies are fast, agile, and feel superhuman compared to that of The Walking Dead and even a far cry from Night of the Living Dead. Zombies have gotten faster, smarter, and deadlier.
And yet to all of that, I have a distain for all of that. I have no interest in Zombies. I do not watch The Walking Dead and will not no matter how much people like it. Zombies turn me off and (personally) find them unbelievable to the extent that its funny. Now, you may think "you're supposed to suspend your beliefs and go with it" and you may have a point. Maybe I need to stop over thinking it. However, in all these movies, there's one thing that I always didn't understand.
How did this Zombie Apocalypse happen? You always catch it in the middle after a troop of people have been infected and are now going around seeking their "human hosts" but it never states where it began and who was patient zero. Not only that, but once they see these symptoms, how are they able to infect more people and how is this disease spread? The traditional route is through biting and flesh wounds, but about skin to skin contact? Is it a blood transfusion? Is it saliva? What constitutes the transformation from Human to Zombie to where we can call them Zombies. Do they have to be dead and then reanimated via virus or is it the slow decay of consciousness until all you think about is infecting another person.
That also has me perplexed. What is a Zombies goal? They aren't cannibals because they don't completely eat the human victim, but merle bite them and move on thus turning the human meal into a Zombie like them. Why stop? Why not eat them whole? Is the flesh feeding them? And if so, why not eat dogs or cows or chickens? That's meat too. That's skin too. Zombies infecting and leaving never made any sense to me.
Until a movie comes out where the origins of the Zombie Virus is explained, and answers the basic questions of infection from a who/what/where/when/why/how stand point, I have no interest in these Zombie films or TV shows. Oh, and as for the movie Warm Bodies coming out, all I can say is GAAAAAAAY!!!!
The trailer for World War Z has been unleashed to the world. Go watch it now. Yes, stop reading and go watch it. You know where to find it. Are you back? Yes? Good. On we go. And yes, I did say unleashed because these Zombies are fast, agile, and feel superhuman compared to that of The Walking Dead and even a far cry from Night of the Living Dead. Zombies have gotten faster, smarter, and deadlier.
And yet to all of that, I have a distain for all of that. I have no interest in Zombies. I do not watch The Walking Dead and will not no matter how much people like it. Zombies turn me off and (personally) find them unbelievable to the extent that its funny. Now, you may think "you're supposed to suspend your beliefs and go with it" and you may have a point. Maybe I need to stop over thinking it. However, in all these movies, there's one thing that I always didn't understand.
How did this Zombie Apocalypse happen? You always catch it in the middle after a troop of people have been infected and are now going around seeking their "human hosts" but it never states where it began and who was patient zero. Not only that, but once they see these symptoms, how are they able to infect more people and how is this disease spread? The traditional route is through biting and flesh wounds, but about skin to skin contact? Is it a blood transfusion? Is it saliva? What constitutes the transformation from Human to Zombie to where we can call them Zombies. Do they have to be dead and then reanimated via virus or is it the slow decay of consciousness until all you think about is infecting another person.
That also has me perplexed. What is a Zombies goal? They aren't cannibals because they don't completely eat the human victim, but merle bite them and move on thus turning the human meal into a Zombie like them. Why stop? Why not eat them whole? Is the flesh feeding them? And if so, why not eat dogs or cows or chickens? That's meat too. That's skin too. Zombies infecting and leaving never made any sense to me.
Until a movie comes out where the origins of the Zombie Virus is explained, and answers the basic questions of infection from a who/what/where/when/why/how stand point, I have no interest in these Zombie films or TV shows. Oh, and as for the movie Warm Bodies coming out, all I can say is GAAAAAAAY!!!!
Thursday, November 8, 2012
I'm going to start doing this again
To past me:
I am sorry for giving up on you. This BLOG was intended as a way for me to express my ideas about the current Hollywood situation and yet, I have not made a post in a year. I have failed you past self. And for this I must take up my guard and start a new. I'm not starting this again because I have to, but because I have a lot of free time here at my job that I feel I can write something each day and keep writing to improve my writing skills. Yes, I probably should be working, but when you have to work an 8hr shift, you need to find ways to not be bored. This will prevent me from turning my office into my room at home with papers strewn everywhere and a lack of organization. By doing this BLOG again, it will help remind me to be professional, but most of all to comment on Hollywood and its unfortunate status.
PS. To anybody else reading this, look at my previous BLOGS to see how I write and if you agree with my opinions, feel free to subscribe or however it is this site notifies you when I write something new.
PPS. To future me, Don't give this up.
-Present me.
I am sorry for giving up on you. This BLOG was intended as a way for me to express my ideas about the current Hollywood situation and yet, I have not made a post in a year. I have failed you past self. And for this I must take up my guard and start a new. I'm not starting this again because I have to, but because I have a lot of free time here at my job that I feel I can write something each day and keep writing to improve my writing skills. Yes, I probably should be working, but when you have to work an 8hr shift, you need to find ways to not be bored. This will prevent me from turning my office into my room at home with papers strewn everywhere and a lack of organization. By doing this BLOG again, it will help remind me to be professional, but most of all to comment on Hollywood and its unfortunate status.
PS. To anybody else reading this, look at my previous BLOGS to see how I write and if you agree with my opinions, feel free to subscribe or however it is this site notifies you when I write something new.
PPS. To future me, Don't give this up.
-Present me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)